Are there two different accounts of creation? Gen 1-2
There are many reasons for this. For instance, in Genesis 1 we observe the use the the Hebrew plural word Elohim meaning "God" and in Genesis 2 we observe the use of God's covenant name, Yahweh, being used. So, though there is one God (Deut. 6:4; Isa. 43:10; 44:6; 1 Tim. 2:5), the Trinity is stressed in Genesis 1 (Gen. 1:2 Acts 17:24 Heb. 1:2 = Let "us" make man in "our" image, after "our" likeness [Gen. 1:26; cf. Gen. 3:22]), while in Genesis 2 God's covenant with Adam is emphasized (cf. Hos. 6:7). Therefore, though stye describe the same Creation account, we would expect differences and similarities in the two accounts.
In addition, Jesus accepted the Sabbath Day as a Day of rest (Mark 2:27-28), a clear reference to Genesis 2:1-3. Jesus called Satan "the father of lies" (John 8:44), which is a clear reference to the lie he told Eve in Genesis 3:4-5. Moses wrote of Christ in Genesis 3:15 (the seed of the woman), and Jesus confirmed it in John 5:46-47.
Clearly, Jesus saw both Genesis 1 and 2 as describing the same Creation. Moreover, he never corrected the text of Genesis 1-2. Jesus himself confirms that the Creation account(s) are the Word of God.
When I was a Homicide Detective, I took an initial interview statement from individuals. It was a chronological account of the way things happened. After this I took a more topical statement, an exploded account, of various things that happened. In this second interview, I was looking for more content on specific items; describe the weapon, the perp, the car, the direction of the get away, etc. This approach assisted greatly in getting to the truth of what happened during the crime(s). It also helped to see if the witness was telling the truth or not (cf. Deut. 17:6; 19:15; Matt. 18:16; 2 Cor. 13:1).
All of us use a common technique in conversation today. We may ask our child what they did today. They may say something like "nothing new; went to school, played basketball, came home." We may naturally ask them to expand a little more on what they did when they came home.
This seems to reflect what is happening in Genesis 1:1-2:3 and 2:4-25. First Moses gives us a chronological account and then in the later section a more topical one, expanding on particular points of what transpired in God's creation of the universe.
Example 2:
Most know that there are seven hills around Rome (Aventine Hill, Caelian Hill, Capitoline Hill, Esquiline Hill, Palatine Hill, Quirinal Hill, and Viminal Hill). If one were to watch Rome burn from each of these seven Hills, they would be observing the "same fire," but from numerous perspectives. Though your descriptions would be related, they each would be a little different as well. In theology we call this recapitulation, which is the same way the last book of the Bible is written too. See "Recapitulation: Interpreting the Book of Revelation?" below.
So, Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 are two accounts of the same Creation.
By his topical comparison, Moses desires us to see that both hopes (seed and land) were certain, because of the reliability of God's promises.
Gen 15:1-6 Comparison Comparison Gen 15:7-21 Gen 15:1 God promises Abram a reward God promises Abram land Gen 15:7 Gen 15:2-3 Abram requests confirmation of a son Abram requests confirmation of the land Gen 15:8 Gen 15:4 God confirms the promise of a seed God confirms the promise of land Gen 15:9-16 Gen 15:5 God demonstrate reliability by pointing to his stars God demonstrate reliability by passing through carnage Gen 15:17 Gen 15:6 Abram believes promise God reaffirms promise;
Abram is without doubtsGen 15:18-21
At other times, topical events are governed by the arrangement of simultaneous events, such as in the stories of Judah (Gen 38:1-30) and Joseph (Gen 39:1-23):
These episodes were simultaneous events. the last scene of chapter 37 develops the story until the time Joseph entered Potiphar's house. We pick up there after the story of Judah and Tamar, when Moses recalled that Joseph had been sold to Potiphar in Egypt (Gen 39:1). The story of Judah and Tamar (Gen 38:1-30) therefore, report an event that took place in Canaan near the time when Joseph was in Potiphar's house. So, there is a compare and contrast set up for us; the stories were juxtaposed to develop the theme of patriarchal morality. Judah fell into sin and suffered severely. Joseph remained pure and God rewarded his righteousness. So, a topical connection is vital to understanding why these chapters appear together.
Text Chronology Text Topically Gen 38:1 At that time ... Deceit, immorality -
"She is more righteous than I"Gen 38:26 Gen 39:1 Now ... Honesty, morality -
"How then can I do this great
wickedness and sin against God?"Gen 39:9
At times, there is a total dischronological set of events, as in 2 Samuel 20-24:
As one can see the events are not chronological, but topical. David's first intervention is closely connected to 2 Samuel 19. The second episode covers David's dealing with the Philistines; the third episode is dated by the text itself to David's deliverance from Saul; the fourth episode begins with "the last words of David;" the fifth section covers a broad range of dates; and the sixth episode probably occurred after the events of 2 Samuel 15-20.
Episode Text Description Royal ? One 2 Sam 21:1-14 David Intervenes Royal Intervention Two 2 Sam 21:15-22 Accomplishments in Battle Royal Warfare Three 2 Sam 22:1-51 David's Song of Praise Royal Words Four 2 Sam 23:1-7 Oracle of David's Wisdom Royal Words Five 2 Sam 23:8-39 Accomplishments in Battle Royal Warfare Six 2 Sam 24:1-25 David Intervenes Royal Intervention
Note the chiastic pattern and the emphasis of the two middle sections on "Royal Words" (see below). A chiastic pattern is a unique repetition pattern for clarification and / or emphasis. See "What are Biblical Chiasms?" below.
- A. Royal Intervention (2 Sam 21:1-14)
- B. Royal Warfare (2 Sam 21:15-22)
- C. Royal Words (2 Sam 22:1-51)
- C'. Royal Words (2 Sam 23:1-7)
- B'. Royal Warfare (2 Sam 23:8-39)
- A'. Royal Intervention (2 Sam 24:1-25)
The New Testament is similar; some is chronological and some topical. For instance, Matthew 8 and 9 are arranged topically - not chronologically. The Book of Revelation is not a chronological listing of events, rather it is more topical; a recapitulation (see below).
So, Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 provides for us two different aspects of Creation: (1) chronological and (2) topical.
Repetition in Scripture is an important facet of faith and truth (Deut 19:15; cf. John 8:17-18). The Bible refers to Creation numerous times without a hint of there being a problem with it:
Gen 5:1, 2; 6:6, 7; 7:4, 9:6; Exod 4:11; 20:9, 10, 11; 31:15, 16, 17; Num 16:22; 27:16; Deut 4:32; 32:6, 15, 18; 1 Sam 2:8; 2 Kings 19:15; 1 Chron 16:26; 2 Chron 2:12; Neh 9:6; Job 4:17; 9:8, 9, 10; 10:3, 8, 9, 11, 12; 12:9, 10; 26:7, 8, 10, 13, 14; 28:26; 31:15; 32:22; 33:4, 6; 34:19; 35:10; 33:6; 37:16, 18; 38:4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 19, 21, 33, 36; 40:15, 19; Psa 8:3, 5, 6; 19:1, 4; 24:1, 2; 33:6, 7, 8, 9, 11; 65:6; 74:16, 17; 78:69; 86:9; 89:11, 12, 47; 90:2; 94:9; 95:4, 5, 6, 7; 96:5; 100:3; 102:18, 25; 103:22; 104:2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 24, 26, 30; 111:4; 115:15; 119:73, 90, 91; 119:152; 121:2; 124:8; 134:3; 136:5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13; 139:14, 16; 146:6; 148:1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; 149:2; Prov 3:19; 8:26, 27, 28, 29; 14:31; 16:4; 17:5; 20:12; 22:2; 30:4; Eccl 3:11; 7:29; 11:5; 12:1, 6; Isa 17:7; 22:11; 27:11; 29:16; 37:16, 26; 40:26, 28; 42:5; 43:1, 7, 10, 15, 21; 44:2, 21, 24; 45:7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 18; 48:7, 13; 49:1, 5; 51:13, 16; 54:5; 57:16; 64:8; 65:17, 18; 66:2; Jer 1:5; 5:22; 10:11, 12, 16; 14:22; 16:18; 27:5; 31:35; 32:17; 33:2; 51:15, 19; Hos 8:14; Amos 4:13; 5:8; 9:6; Jonah 1:9; Zech 12:1; Mal 2:10; Matt 13:35; 19:4, 5; Mark 10:6; 13:19; John 1:1, 2, 3, 10; 17:24; Acts 4:24; 7:50; 14:15; 17:24, 25, 26, 28, 29; Rom 1:20, 23, 25; 4:17; 8:19, 20, 21, 22; 9:20; 11:36; 1 Cor 8:6; 11:9, 12; 12:18, 24; 15:38, 45, 47; 2 Cor 5:17, 18; Eph 2:10; 3:9; 4:24; Col 1:15, 16, 17; 3:10; 1 Tim 2:13; 4:3, 4; 6:13; Heb 1:2, 10; 2:10; 3:4; 11:3; 12:9; Jas 3:9; 1 Pet 4:19; 2 Pet 2:1; 3:4; Rev 3:14; 4:11; 10:6; 14:7; cf. see the other related words in Gen 14:19, 22; Psa 118:24; Isa 40:22; Ezek 28:13, 15; Matt 25:34; Eph 1:4; Heb 4:3, 4; Heb 9:26; 1 Pet 1:20; Rev 13:8; 17:8.
As is clearly seen, segments of the Creation story are repeated over and over again, by many Biblical writers. Genesis 1 and 2 tell the truth concerning Creation. If the inspired writers (2 Tim 3:16; 2 Pet 1:20-21) had no problem with God's Creation, than neither should we.
An attack upon Biblical Creation is an attack upon God himself and all of Scripture; its inspiration, inerrancy, infallibility, authority, necessity, sufficiently, and clarity (or perspicuity), etc. Such an attack, demands a serious well-studied reply from the believer!
[1] Wayne Jackson, "Fortify Your Faith in an Age of Doubt" (1982, Apologetics Press).
[2] Pratt, Jr. Richard.,He Gave Us Stories, P & R Publishing, 1993.
What is the Big Bang Theory?
What is the Day Age Theory?
What is Ex-nihilo?
The Framework Theory
What is the Gap Theory?
What About Hebrews 11:3?
What is the Intelligent Design Theory?
What is the Mature Universe Theory?
What is Old Earth Creationism (OEC)?
What is Progressive Creationism?
What is Theistic Evolution?
What is Young Earth Creationism (YEC)?
Dr. Joseph R. Nally, Jr., D.D., M.Div. is the Theological Editor at Third Millennium Ministries (Thirdmill).