Overview of the Book of Ecclesiastes
Purpose:
To demonstrate that life viewed merely from a realistic human perspective must result in pessimism, and to offer hope through humble obedience and faithfulness to God until the final judgment.
Date: 930-586 B.C.
Although it seems clear that Solomon's wise sayings deeply influenced this book, it is not indisputable that Solomon actually wrote this book. Unlike the book of Proverbs, which freely attributes much of its material to Solomon, Ecclesiastes nowhere explicitly identifies Solomon by name. Even the expression "son of David" (Eccl. 1:1) may be translated "descendant of David," or possibly "an official in David's court." In fact, the writer appears intentionally to distance himself from Solomon. It would have been odd for Solomon to say that he "was king" (Eccl. 1:12), using the past tense, for there was never a time when he ceased being king prior to his death. The statement that others had ruled in Jerusalem before him (Eccl. 1:16) also appears an unlikely - although not impossible (see note on Eccl. 1:16) - statement for Solomon to make. The book reflects on hardship (Eccl. 1:2-8), death (Eccl. 3:1-15), injustice (Eccl. 4:1-3), pagan tyranny (Eccl. 5:7, 9-19), and suffering at the hands of rulers (Eccl. 8:9). None of these descriptions fit well with Solomon. It is possible therefore that sometime after Solomon's reign an unknown sage compiled, edited, shaped and framed reflections that may have come in part from Solomon and added introductory and summary perspectives (Eccl. 1:1; 12:9-14). However, it should be remembered that, like all wise men in Jerusalem's royal court, this writer drew heavily upon Solomon's wisdom in all that he wrote (cf. Hezekiah's wise men in Prov. 25:1).
Ecclesiastes focuses on how God's people should live on earth in the face of life's difficulties and enigmas. Ecclesiastes is thus not an apologetic to those who are ignorant of God or rebellious against him; it is wise counsel to those cognizant of, but perplexed by, God's ways. In this respect, Ecclesiastes is like the book of Job. While Job's dialogues and monologues search for understanding of God's wisdom within the circumstance of an innocent man's suffering, Ecclesiastes is more philosophical in its approach and speaks of the condition of all humans. Ecclesiastes also probes the limits of conventional proverbial wisdom (see Eccl. 12:9) by balancing expectations of justice and prosperity often raised by proverbial wisdom with the harsh realities of living in a fallen world controlled by the inscrutable wisdom of God. It also encourages fidelity to God in the perplexing difficulties that so many people face.
In the end, however, the conclusion of Ecclesiastes is very similar to that of Job. Despite our inability to understand fully the good wisdom of God, our appropriate and wise human response is to "fear God and keep his commandments" (Eccl. 12:13; see note on Job 28:28). That is, we are to submit to God and demonstrate our awareness of his supreme wisdom by obeying his law, trusting that he is full of wisdom and goodness in spite of the enigmas life presents even to those who know him.
The Teacher's words are arranged in three cycles (Eccl. 1:3-3:8; 3:9-6:7; 6:8-12:7), each of which begins with a similar phrase: "What does man gain?" (Eccl. 1:3), "What does the worker gain?" (Eccl. 3:9) and "What advantage has a wise man?" (Eccl. 6:8). Each cycle contains an introduction (Eccl. 1:3-11; 3:9-21; 6:8-12), followed by variously arranged sections. Words are positioned to build textual units and are used in multiple senses to provoke meditation on the book's ideas. While repetition of topics and words builds concentric structural units, there is progression of thought in Ecclesiastes. The writer pairs the themes of work and wisdom. His first cycle contains three pairs of sections (Eccl. 1:12-15 and Eccl. 1:16-18; 2:1-11 and Eccl. 2:12-17; 2:18-26 and Eccl. 3:1-8) presenting the conclusion that although the employment of human labor and understanding provides the satisfaction of accomplishment, the profit achieved for a human being is canceled by death.
The paired themes of work and wisdom are subsequently elaborated in the book's second and third cycles, respectively. The second cycle (Eccl. 3:9-6:7) develops the theme of human labor, contrasting it with God's perfect, enduring works and counseling enjoyment of the simple blessings God provides in this life, even in the face of human oppression. The third cycle (Eccl. 6:8-12:7) elaborates the theme of human wisdom, contrasting it with the inscrutability of God's ways. This cycle advises the audience to enjoy life and work diligently, even though effort and righteousness may not be appropriately rewarded in this life.
The author's conclusion that death renders all labor and efforts to acquire superhuman wisdom vain (Eccl. 1:14, 17; 2:11, 17) does not imply, as some ancients thought, that people should abandon society and cultural efforts. On the contrary, the writer instructed God's people to enjoy life-despite its apparent futility, harsh realities and uncertainties-and to work with full vigor (Eccl. 9:7-10). This realistic approach views life as a gift from God (Eccl. 3:13; 5:19) for those who fear him and keep his commands (Eccl. 5:1-7; 12:13-14).
Ecclesiastes grapples with the question of how people should live in fidelity to God (Eccl. 6:12) in a world in which the good Creator (Eccl. 3:11, 14) and just Judge (Eccl. 3:17) sovereignly ordains that "bad" things happen to the righteous (Eccl. 7:13-14) as well as to the wicked, rather than that each individual will receive his or her deserved recompense in this life (Eccl. 8:14; 9:1). Faith in God's wisdom despite human inability fully to discern it is to be exercised not only in the face of human oppression (Eccl. 3:22-4:3), but also in the face of the constant futility that death brings (Eccl. 9:7-10).
Dr. Richard L. Pratt, Jr. is Co-Founder and President of Third Millennium Ministries who served as Professor of Old Testament at Reformed Theological Seminary and has authored numerous books.