Overview of the Book of Judges
Purpose:
To establish Israel's need for a godly king from the line of David.
Date: c. 1000 -538 B.C.
Nevertheless, there are some indications that the book may have come to its final form at a later time. The attention to false worship in Dan (Judges 18:30) reflects interests well-suited to the time after Jeroboam II had established his false worship in the Northern Kingdom (c. 930 B.C.). Some interpreters have also suggested that "until the captivity of the land" (Judes. 18:30) refers to the captivity of the Northern Kingdom in 722 B.C. Although earlier defeats in battle may have been in mind (see note on Judges 18:30), this later possibility cannot be ruled out completely. The patterning of Samuel's birth after Samson's birth in Judges 13:2 (see note on 1 Sam. 1:1) strongly suggests that at least a preliminary form of the book of Judges was completed by the time 1 and 2 Samuel were written.
The events narrated in the book span the approximately 350 year period from the conquest of Canaan (c. 1400 B.C.) until just prior to the time of Samuel, who anointed Israel's first king (c. 1050 B.C.). Othniel, the first judge, was in the generation after Joshua, and Samson, the final judge, was more or less contemporary with Samuel. During this period the Israelites were oppressed by enemies from within (the Canaanites) and without (the Arameans, Moabites, Midianites, Ammonites, Amalekites, Amorites, and Philistines).
In general terms, the author of Judges evaluated the events of this period in Israel's history by using the theological concerns of Deuteronomy. Time and again, covenant violations highlighted in Deuteronomy were identified and the corresponding covenant judgments were pronounced (see Judes. 2:1-5; 6:7-10; 8:27; 9:56; 10:11-13; 21:25). See "Introduction to the Historical Books."
More specifically, however, the book of Judges established the importance of godly Davidic kingship. This point of view was advanced in the book in a number of ways:
(1) The author pointed out that in the past the people of God had sinned because their appointed leaders had failed. He recorded that parents (Judges 2:6-10; 6:11-32, especially Judges 6:13, 22-25), priests (Judges 17:1-13), judges (Judges 4:9; 8:27; 11:39; 14:3), and Israel's first king (Judges 8:33-9:57) had not led the people of God to faithful observance of God's law. In his view, only a covenant-keeping king from Judah could lead the people into covenant obedience and correlative blessing and prevent new oppression.
(2) Recalling the Lord's saving acts (Judges 2:10; 6:13) and refraining from the worship of false gods were the chief challenges Israel confronted in the book of Judges in keeping covenant. As in Deuteronomy, seeking other gods was the sin synonymous with covenant disobedience (Judges 2:11-12; 3:7, 12; 8:33; 10:6, 10; Deut. 4:23). The repeated cycles with the repeated refrains of "The Israelites did evil in the eyes of the LORD" (e.g., Judges 3:7, 12; 4:1) and "Everyone did as he saw fit" (Judges 17:6; 21:25; see also Deut. 12:8; 31:16-17) served as a stiff warning to the Israelites in the early part of David's reign concerning their peril if they failed to choose a covenant-keeping king.
(3) Even though Judges never mentions David's name, it purposefully and prominently plays Judah and Benjamin against one another probably at a time when a debate raged over from which tribe Israel's king would come. The writer of Judges affirmed Judah's leadership (Judges 1:1-2; 1:3-20) and rejected any reliance on leadership from the tribe of Benjamin (see note on Judges 1:21).
Dr. Richard L. Pratt, Jr. is Co-Founder and President of Third Millennium Ministries who served as Professor of Old Testament at Reformed Theological Seminary and has authored numerous books.