I have a question about the nature of the New Covenant. I have been debating a Baptist friend online in a Reformed message board about whether or not there are unbelievers included in the New Covenant. I have argued that the warning passages given in the book of Hebrews and the many parallels given between the Mosaic covenant and the New covenant strongly suggest that members of the covenant can break the covenant (of course, the elect keep the covenant, while the non-elect do not). However, it has been argued by some Presbyterians in the message board that the New Covenant is not conditional, but that it only contains believers. But this is the same argument that Baptists use to argue against paedobaptism because they will not allow for an unregenerate person to receive the sign of the covenant.
Do you think the New Covenant is breakable? Do you think that the warnings of apostasy in Hebrews apply to New Covenant members who, if they do not remain faithful to Christ, will be covenant breakers? If not, then who do the warnings apply to?
Dr. John M. Frame is Professor of Systematic Theology and Philosophy at Reformed Theological Seminary in Orlando, FL.